🔗 Share this article

I have a few opinions about that remarks delivered by the sports network broadcaster a well-known announcer after the Serbian champion's victory over the American player in the US Open last eight. Look – the athlete represents American, Fowler is American – and athletic competitions frequently lend themselves to nationalism. A little bit of disappointment would have been appropriate. Rather, Fowler invoked the ongoing absence of American men at grand slam tournaments: not one of them had lifted a trophy since the last American champion in 2003, and Fritz had been the final representative in the competition.

We all enjoy a storyline, me too. But really. Suppose the American defeated the legend for the first time, phenomenal talent the Spanish star was waiting in the next round, whom he has yet to beat in an competitive encounter. And had he someway survived that, it would have been defending champion Jannik Sinner, versus him the American had dropped 10 of the previous eleven sets. The two young stars had also divided the last seven major titles (and the Spaniard went on to defeat a fatigued Serbian in the subsequent match). Fritz stated in press after the loss that he actually preferred his path, because it offered the chance to defeat the top three competitors in the sport in succession. Fritz is more than within his right to aim for the accomplishment; an athlete is meant to have faith in themselves. But going into that Serbian last eight match what other person in their right mind had the drought of American champions on the brain?

The American star's second serve the only thing standing in her way and consistent victories

The American, twenty-eight, is placed number four in the global rankings entering this week’s year-end championships and has secured his last six matches over third-ranked the German with increasing ease. It's likely he might claim that position for himself in the future. But evidently that at present, that’s as high as he can climb: Sinner and Alcaraz sit a chasm of performance metrics away. Fritz’s top-class delivery and powerful power on each front side and backhand are more than enough to dispose of the majority of rivals on the professional circuit. Against the handful of once-in-a-lifetime players, however, he is frequently overmatched. The past few years has witnessed the interesting rise of lanky, towering athletes who can nonetheless cover the court with the surprising quickness and grace of smaller men. Fritz is 6ft 5ins and looks it. His movement is stiff, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his legs. So he’ll rarely win a rally that the other player was dictating, and hitting a drop shot against him is usually a reliable tactic. That acts as a pretty severe restriction on his upside.

Fritz has made a several dramatic, improbable improvements over the years. At the beginning of the decade, he was circling the bottom of the world's best thirty. Two years after, he was approaching the top 10. Last year, he unexpectedly exploded to No 4 – and maintained the position. But the next leap, mixing it up with and defeating legendary figures like Alcaraz, the Italian, and even a aging Djokovic, is the toughest of all. What was Fowler have been thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to beat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate commenting on the ongoing drought of US male players winning major titles when Fritz had exited the New York major in the quarter-finals? The thirst is just excessive and the respect for the magnitude of the task insufficient.

The American star made a personal best advancement to the All England Club last four in the summer.

The American's play in that very last eight match ought to have been sufficient of an sign. Djokovic won in four rounds, a win that only seemed uncertain for moments towards the conclusion, when Fritz had saved a few championship opportunities and had a chance to hold for 5-5. The pair looked well-balanced during the rallies, with Fritz earning numerous chances to break. But the champion saved break point after service break opportunity, extending the run to the brink of frustration. When Fritz finally did claim one of the chances at 5-5 in the second set, he immediately produced a horrendous service game to drop serve once more; Djokovic had lulled him into a skirmish secondary to the main contest and forced him to expend excessive effort to prevail. Down match points in the final game, his primary delivery sailed to heaven. He extended the match two times on his backup delivery, but ultimately double-faulted. It wasn’t a choke, I didn’t think, just a result of having to hit too many weaker deliveries.

The contest was quite ironclad proof that Fritz is insufficiently skilled to beat any version of the Serbian, that was defeated by Alcaraz in the following match and did not particularly seem like he thought he could win. This is absolutely acceptable – the Serbian is the greatest of all time, and may not be at the height of his physical powers now, but has acquired sufficient knowledge and tactical know-how to make up for quite a bit of the drop-off. The issue is the individuals who were expecting the American to win, and putting pressure on him to achieve that, when he was had not done anything that indicated he could.

Fritz is an asset to the tour nonetheless. He’s a calm, reflective presence in press conferences, more so than virtually everyone on the men's tour aside from the Russian star, willing to not just express his emotions or the tactic he felt decided a match, but explain it. That he ought to bear the brunt of the blame for the United States failing to spawn a men's grand slam winner since the last American titlist seems unjust. (Since the fellow American is rubbing shoulders with him in the standings, maybe they can divide that burden.)

ATP Finals: Singles Groups

American legend Division

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• The Australian speedster
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Swedish icon Division

• The Italian champion
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• The rising American
• The Canadian talent

“I’d probably dwell on it indefinitely if I fail to do it,” Fritz informed an interviewer in June of winning a grand slam. I hope he understands that he’s not a failure if he does not fulfill that objective, that overcoming the Spanish and Italian's dominant, formidable reign is actually extremely unlikely for everybody else. {