🔗 Share this article

Mounting worries are present regarding the possibility of military engagement involving East African neighbors, Ethiopia and Eritrea, as confrontational rhetoric has intensified in the past few weeks.

What Has Ethiopian Officials Declared?

Landlocked Ethiopia's calls for passage to the sea coast through Eritrea has provoked a fierce war of words.

The Ethiopian leader initially stated publicly in the previous year that his nation's maritime access was an crucial concern, statements that Eritrean authorities rejected.

Ties between the two countries have regularly been difficult. After a prolonged battle for independence, Eritrea, which has a extensive Red Sea coastline, legally broke away from Ethiopian rule in the early 1990s, leaving it landlocked.

Five years later, a territorial conflict erupted in which over a hundred thousand people died.

Current Statements from Ethiopia's Leadership

Abiy and army chief the army commander have directly stated control of Eritrean maritime facility of the port of Assab – about 60km from the frontier - and suggested the wish to capture it through military means.

On 1 September, Abiy said the country's "blunder" of losing access to the Red Sea as a due to Eritrea's separation would be "corrected soon".

The Ethiopian envoy to Kenya, retired Gen Bacha Debele, said that Assab was "Ethiopia's wealth" and would be given back "through military action".

Eritrean Reaction to the Statements

Despite continuous challenges from Ethiopian officials, Eritrea's response has been limited to brief comments on social media from Communications Head Yemane Gebremeskel.

The minister has dismissed Ethiopian requests for sea access calling it "dangerous" and a "harmful plan" of "expansionism" – a approach of claiming back lost territory.

Eritrean authorities cautioned on 16 September that moves to legitimise "blatant hostility" would have major implications for the Ethiopian government and its regional partners and is a "limit that should not be crossed|violated|breached".

Military Movements on the Region

There have been few indications of major military movements in the boundary zones between the neighboring states.

Nevertheless, in the country, national TV has shown completion events of thousands of cadets at various military training camps.

The leader of personnel division of the military, the officer, recently said in an discussion that the army was in a "reliable position" as "tens of thousands of recruits" were joining it, which he said was "a message to our enemies".

Historical Roots of the Tension

For over fifty years from 1890, Eritrea was ruled by colonial powers.

Following World War II, it was then managed by the British administration before becoming a integrated region of the Ethiopian empire.

Yet in 1962 the ruler terminated this arrangement and Eritrea became fully incorporated into the Ethiopian state.

A three-decade long armed struggle followed, ending with military reversal in the early 1990s. Autonomy was then approved by the population in a referendum in 1993.

Briefly in the 1990s, there were friendly connections between the governments in Addis Ababa and Eritrea's capital, but they disagreed over the exact location of their shared boundary, resulting in conflict in 1998.

Although this concluded in a ceasefire agreement in 2000, it was partially applied, and the neighbors continued at in dispute.

This changed in 2018, when Abiy made gestures to Eritrea's leader the president. The two signed a announcement that the conflict was over – a decision that gained Abiy the Nobel Peace Prize.

The two governments were then cooperators in Ethiopia's previous civil war in the northern region.

But diplomatic connections have since broken down anew.